When is it appropriate to list both positive and negative outcomes in an assertive conversation?

Listing both positive and negative outcomes in an assertive conversation is particularly effective when addressing potential issues while maintaining motivation. This approach allows all parties involved to recognize the full scope of a situation, which includes understanding not only the positive possibilities but also the challenges or negative outcomes that might arise.

By framing the conversation this way, it encourages openness and creates a space where individuals feel comfortable discussing concerns without diminishing their motivation. Acknowledging potential negatives alongside positives can also foster a more realistic perspective, enabling better decision-making and instilling a sense of preparedness among all participants. It cultivates a balanced dialogue that values both optimism and realism, which is vital for fostering resilience and proactive problem-solving.

Other options suggest limitations or contexts that do not fully leverage the benefits of open communication. For instance, only discussing negatives when unavoidable could lead to a one-sided perspective, while asserting that this approach should be applied in every conversation might overwhelm or confuse participants. Conversely, waiting until after a resolution narrows the opportunity for proactive engagement and could prevent team members from collaborating effectively in the moment.